立場新聞 Stand News

【有得聽】港大校委會會議錄音流出 證實李國章Nice Guy論 嘲陳文敏是「黨委書記」

2015/10/28 — 10:50


商台發放的李國章錄音,涉及9月29日當晚會議中的發言,當晚李國章提出否決陳文敏任命的理由,包括陳能當選法學院院長只因他是「nice guy」、陳沒有博士學位、陳的任命有政黨干預等。




「The second thing I’d like to bring up is that, we’ve been said that we’ve been under a lot of pressure form the liaison office, from the Chief Executive, and I’d like to say very categorically I have not been under any pressure. It has been said that the left-wing press, 文匯報、大公報 have been running hundreds of articles against this candidate. And quite honestly, I don’t read 文匯報 or 大公報, and I think most people in Hong Kong do not read 文匯報 or 大公報. Relatively most people take a negative view, the more they say about something, the more we feel anti whatever they say. However, on the other side, it’s that the political parties are very well organized, very well informed, very well…how would I say… very keen to push this candidate by, as Leonie said, by intimidation, by failing our council meeting, by having concern groups and all these threatening JRs and everything. But I just wonder why is these political parties so keen on this candidate, is it, you know, in the Mainland university, they have 黨委書記. Do they want a 黨委書記 at Hong Kong U? Is he a 黨委書記, is he put in here as a 黨委書記? So I don’t know, forgetting about the politics, all these things made me feel very uncomfortable and very uneasy with this candidate.」


另一段「Nice Guy論」的原文如下:

「However, I do have some worries that I feel I should articulate, the Dean, the vice chancellor, in those days, were elected by the Faculty. So all you have to do is to be a nice guy to everyone, and I think Johannes Chan is a very nice guy. And at this point, I’d like to declare my interest; there was one of the referees which is my cousin. And my cousin has already said he’s a very very nice guy.」

對此,節目主持人陳聰質疑,陳文敏受到物色委員會推薦為副校長唯一候選人,就已經證明他不是純粹的「nice guy」,又指「純粹(指他是)nice guy點可以用嚟推翻物色委員會作出嘅決定呢?」另一名主持陳志雲續稱,「(被物色委員會推薦)咁佢一定係more than nice啦」,他認為委員會主席在會上應維護各院長的尊嚴,澄清被選為院長,並不是純粹因為是「nice guy」,而是因為該人士的能力。


「So from that point of view, I have no worry in that he is dean, my main worry on academic side was that he has no higher degree equal to a PhD or an MD or LLD, now you may say in law is not necessary. Well, if it is not necessary, why is such a degree there in the first place? And when you look at the other referee professors, they all got LLDs. Therefore, either he hasn’t tried or he is too busy or he doesn’t think it is important, but if that’s the case he will be devaluated maybe of the lecturers, professors who have got PhDs, who have gone through the rigours of academic pursues. Now, can you, can someone be in charge of promotion of another person who actually has not gone through the same rigours as that other person and give an honest independent objective view? And I would put my question here is that, I do have my doubt about this. 」